Curse

callumevans324 · Jun 11, 2006, 10:09 PM // 22:09

A good idea would be to have customizable guild hierarchy like: Leader, steward,member,initiate. All of Which would be editable, just like in World Of Warcraft. This would be a more exciting experience for guilds as a whole. World Of warcraft has an awesome guild rank system which i think would really imporve Guild Wars.

It would also be a good idea to set permissions for each of these groups "can access guild hall?" or "can use guild chat". This would prove a good way of punishing a bad member, and help keep them in line. It would also help for certain officers that you might not trust with a kick permisssion, one of the worst fears is having your guild kicked out by an officer.

Demesis · Jun 11, 2006, 10:37 PM // 22:37

I want to have the post of Guild Chef.

Cjlr · Jun 12, 2006, 12:24 AM // 00:24

Guild Bartender!
Guild Janitor!
Guild Butler!

But in all seriousness I can't see why not.

/signed.

mariano · Jun 13, 2006, 10:35 AM // 10:35

I can not sign this ^^

I would like there were more options for a guild's management: like more information about members in the guild panel (like in WoW), more in-game means of information for a guild (say a guild hall's board) and about a guild (say a player's information board about guilds), and more options for player to player, player to guild and guild to player communication and relation (say off-line messaging, guild join request feature, social channel).

I would like less hierachy and less militaristic guilds and more shared leadership, cooperation and competitive thinking (say not like WoW which is a way too militaristic); say more like a community of heroes.

Kaldor Meshekal · Jun 13, 2006, 10:54 AM // 10:54

From the beginning of the game when my Guild was created I wanted something like this. The only problem I see with it already exists; those who Guild hop until someone lets them be an Officer.

Slainster · Jun 13, 2006, 11:13 AM // 11:13

i think a little more heirarchy might be nice, it may even encourage people to stick with their guilds if they have to work there way up the system.. but it does place more burden on officers\leaders to ensure ranking is fair, and actually achieved.. id hate to be stuck at at "guild peasent" just cos I had a lazy leader\officer (BTW not saying my leader is lazy!!!)

Evilsod · Jun 13, 2006, 01:51 PM // 13:51

/signed for more inguild positions

/notsigned for methods of punishment

MMSDome · Jun 13, 2006, 06:29 PM // 18:29

a great idea which i cant decide to sign or not sign. You should only recrtuit members you know you can trust if you want a solid guild and which case you give everyone a chance to speak it can improve your guild instead of limiting the guilds peasants which make up 80% of your guilds speaknig rights. A Hierarchy would be fun and has much potential and has a bunch of flaws with in it. I say chance it in a beta and see how it works, i fun idea

I want to be the crazy wizard/wizardess that reports directly to the leader and fills his mind with terrible thoughts!

Isgorathe Huang · Jun 13, 2006, 09:51 PM // 21:51

The current Guild hierachy system is awful, any improvment would be a good improvement.

/signed

Malice Black · Jun 14, 2006, 01:20 AM // 01:20

this is a good idea..might stop guild hoppers..all except me 30+ guilds and counting

awesome sauce · Jun 14, 2006, 02:52 AM // 02:52

Quote:

Originally Posted by mariano

I would like less hierachy and less militaristic guilds and more shared leadership, cooperation and competitive thinking (say not like WoW which is a way too militaristic); say more like a community of heroes.

Ooh so how about having an option when starting your guild to make it a democracy or dictatorship or oligarchy type setup? hmm you have caught me onto something.

Replicant · Jun 14, 2006, 04:27 AM // 04:27

/signed

jackie · Jun 14, 2006, 05:06 AM // 05:06

/signed

Depth to the guild system would be more than welcome.

Stupid Shizno · Jun 14, 2006, 10:15 AM // 10:15

/signed

Shoeth · Jun 14, 2006, 11:22 AM // 11:22

/signed

This game is called GUILD Wars for a reason....

Night Daftshadow · Jun 14, 2006, 11:22 AM // 11:22

/signed for guild positions, not for ways of punishment

I think this would be a good idea. I've seen some members within a guild who have been with the guild for quite some time(months) but are still titled as regular members. That's just a shame. A title like "Senior Member" would be nice or something similar.

Lord Devenish · Jun 14, 2006, 12:13 PM // 12:13

/signed

ive posted this before but didnt get a big responce, i think its been needed for a while.

shadowfell · Jun 14, 2006, 12:18 PM // 12:18

Quote:

Originally Posted by Malice Black

this is a good idea..might stop guild hoppers..all except me 30+ guilds and counting

You're just a rebel MB.. and yay.. baby eater hath returned.

oh btw

/signed

TsunamiZ · Jun 15, 2006, 08:44 PM // 20:44

Anyone else think we could use a more informative guild management system? For example: We should be able to have PVE / PVP officers / members categories in guild list. Basically, more categories than just leader, officer, member.

Kind of like how you can assign channels in TS / Ven, it would be nice if you can name your own categories and set privaledges in each one.

Vermilion · Jun 15, 2006, 09:30 PM // 21:30

Maybe its been brought up before, but I like this idea. Customizing your own sounds the best..just as long as you don't end up with stupid/inappropriate ones.

Hopefully the guild leader and/or officers would be more mature and that wouldn't happen..